Flojo International, Inc. v. Lassleben
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FROEHLICH, J.
This appeal deals with the enforceability of contract commitments made in the course of reorganization of a rubber sandal distribution business. We conclude that the trial court erred in ruling that no consideration supported commitments made by the corporation in connection with the reorganization, and we also determine that the trial court erred in not recognizing the provisions of the California Uniform Commercial Code which govern the rights of a transferee of a negotiable instrument.
Factual and Procedural Background
The parties to this transaction are two families and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- U. S. Financial v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Yule v. BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Sanders v. MagillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Bank of America v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Quimby v. VarnumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jara v. Suprema Meats, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Great Western Bank v. KongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Quality Wash Group V, Ltd. v. HallakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996