Legal Opinion

Great Western Bank v. Kong

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 22, 2001No. F034149PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LEVY, J.

The issue presented in this appeal is whether partners who settle with a partnership creditor and thereby become assignees of a deficiency judgment based on a partnership debt can enforce that judgment against a nonsettling partner. The trial court ruled that such enforcement is permissible and proceeded accordingly.

However, contrary to the trial court’s conclusion, the assignee partners do not acquire the assignor’s rights with respect to the judgment. Rather, the assignment of a joint and several debt to one or more of the co-obligors extinguishes that debt. Consequently, no…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Bailes v. KeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Gordon v. WanseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  4. North v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Teater v. Good Hope Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. BNP Paribas Mortgage Corp. v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  2. Cal-Western Business Services, Inc. v. Corning Capital GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Word Investments, Inc. v. Bruinsma (In Re TML, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2003
  4. Carter v. Brooms (In Re Brooms)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Duke v. Superior Court of Kern Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API