Legal Opinion

Soto v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 1996No. B096923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HASTINGS, J.

This is a petition for review from denial of reconsideration by the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. We are presented with two issues: (1) upon what amount is the penalty assessment pursuant to Labor Code section 5814 calculated; and, (2) whether the unreasonable failure to timely pay interest on benefits due, and later payment at an improper rate, is a single course of conduct or two separate acts for purposes of a section 5814 penalty assessment.

We conclude that Rhiner v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1993) 4 Cal.4th 1213 [18 Cal.Rptr.2d 129, 848 P.2d 244] requires that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Steven A. v. Rickie M.California Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Gallamore v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Rhiner v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Laucirica v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Tucker v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Koszdin v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. California Highway Patrol v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API