Legal Opinion

United States v. King

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided June 12, 1987No. CM 442194PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT ON REMAND

DeFORD, Senior Judge:

The appellant was convicted contrary to his pleas by a general court-martial convened at Fort Ord, California, during the months of September through November of 1981 of carnal knowledge, sodomy (two specifications), conduct unbecoming an officer and gentleman (seven specifications), and obstruction of justice in violation of Articles 120, 125, 133 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 920, 925, 933 and 934 [hereinafter UCMJ], respectively.

His approved sentence included dismissal from the service, confinement for fourteen…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  2. United States v. FrederickUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  3. United States v. WimberleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  4. United States v. Robert LyonsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. BurnsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. LillyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  2. United States v. KingU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
  3. United States v. WalkerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API