Legal Opinion

United States v. King

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided January 10, 1991No. CM 442194PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT ON FURTHER REVIEW

NAUGHTON, Senior Judge:

The appellant was convicted, contrary to his pleas, by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, during November and December 1987, of sodomy (1 specification), conduct unbecoming an officer and gentleman (3 specifications), and rape (1 specification), in violation of Articles 125, 133, and 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 925, 933, and 920 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ], respectively. His approved sentence includes dismissal from the service, confinement for life, and forfeiture…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. Coker v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  5. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. PerezU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
  2. United States v. LeakArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
  3. United States v. McMonagleU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
  4. United States v. RobertsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API