Legal Opinion

Peebly v. Childers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided August 18, 1923No. 14569PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KANE, J.'

This was a suit in equity commenced by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against the defendant in error, • defendant below, for the purpose of enjoining the latter as State Auditor from paying out or attempting to pay out any amounts or slims of the moneys appropriated by chapter 33, Sess. Laws 1923, for salaries and maintenance of the University of Oklahoma, for the years 1924 and 1925.

The contention of the plaintiff was that the action of the Governor in approving in part and disapproving in part the salary and maintenance items of the appropriation hill after the final…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fergus v. RusselIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Woodall v. DarstWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Fulmore v. LaneTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  4. State v. HolderMississippi Supreme Court · 1898
  5. May v. ToppingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Johnson v. WaltersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. Mills v. PorterMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Wood v. State Administrative BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. State Ex Rel. Hudson v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Mandel v. O'HARACourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API