Legal Opinion

People v. Lindsay

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 2011No. 110089PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

Chief Justice Kilbride and Justices Freeman, Gar-man, Karmeier, Burke, and Theis concurred in the judgment and opinion.

OPINION

The issue in this case is whether, on remand for the failure to file a Rule 604(d) certificate of compliance, defense counsel also must file a new motion to withdraw the guilty plea and/or reconsider the sentence. We hold that, where counsel concludes that the original motion is sufficient, a new motion need not be filed.

BACKGROUND

Defendant, Robert W. Lindsay, pleaded guilty to one count of delivering a controlled substance (720 ILCS 570/ 401(a)(2)(C) (West 2006)) and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. JanesIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. LinderIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. ShirleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  4. D.S. v. R.S.Illinois Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. HayesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. EastonIllinois Supreme Court · 2019
  2. People v. EastonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  3. People v. BernardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  4. People v. BridgesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  5. People v. GabrysAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API