First National Bank v. First National Bank
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
October Term, 1886, No. 229, W. D., before Gordon, Paxson, Trunkey, Sterrett, Gteen, and Olark, JTJ. Certiorari sur appeal from a decree of the Common Pleas of Westmoreland County confirming the report of the auditor to distribute the fund in the hands of an assignee for the benefit of creditors. The facts and proceedings which gave rise to this appeal are set forth in Gallagher’s Appeal, 114 Pa. 353, 5 Cent. Rep. 725, 60 Am. Rep. 350, 7 Atl. 237. ^ .....
Read the full summary
October Term, 1886, No. 229, W. D., before Gordon, Paxson, Trunkey, Sterrett, Gteen, and Olark, JTJ. Certiorari sur appeal from a decree of the Common Pleas of Westmoreland County confirming the report of the auditor to distribute the fund in the hands of an assignee for the benefit of creditors. The facts and proceedings which gave rise to this appeal are set forth in Gallagher’s Appeal, 114 Pa. 353, 5 Cent. Rep. 725, 60 Am. Rep. 350, 7 Atl. 237. ^ ..... The assignments of error were as follows: “First. The court erred in confirming the report of the auditor. “Second. The court erred in…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Paxson:
This case is disposed by what was said in Gallagher’s Appeal, 314 Pa. 353, 5 Cent. Rep. 125, 60 Am. Rep. 350, 7 Atl. 237. The second assignment of error raises the only important question, and that was fully discussed in this case referred to. The third assignment is not in conformity to the rules of court.
Decree affirmed and the appeal dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brzyski v. SchreiberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Gallagher's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886