Legal Opinion
Rainey v. Perkins Township Board of Trustees
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 23, 2025No. 3:22-cv-00042Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Dannie Rainey, Case No. 3:22-cv-42 Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Perkins Township/Perkins Board of Trustees, et al., Defendants. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Dannie Rainey, proceeding pro se, sued Perkins Township, Ohio, its police department, individually named Perkins Township police officers, the Law Director for the City of Sandusky, individually named prosecutors for the City of Sandusky, individually named prosecutors for Erie County, Ohio, two Erie County judges, the Erie County Sheriff’s Office,…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.