Aspgren v. Burress
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day
We will refer to the plaintiffs in error as petitioners, in which capacity they appeared in the trial court. The *304issue in this case is whether they, as employees in the superior court at the time of their action in the trial court, were covered by the Civil Service Amendment to the constitution.
A petition in the nature of mandamus was filed in the Denver district court alleging that petitioners were employees in various capacities in the superior court in the City and County of Denver; that they had made formal application to the respondent Civil Service Commission to be classified under…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People ex rel. Riordan v. HerseySupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
- Getty v. WitterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
- People ex rel. Fisher v. LuxfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
- People v. MorleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
- Civil Service Commission v. People Ex Rel. BeatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.