Borner v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DOUGLAS, Judge.
These are appeals from convictions for the possession of marihuana. Punishment was assessed against each appellant at ten years. The proof shows that the appellants possessed a large amount of marihuana in an automobile.
The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged. The complaint on appeal is that the marihuana was found in the automobile without a search warrant over the objection, among others, that it was an unreasonable search in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
On February 5, 1973, at approximately 2:00 p. m., Highway…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Crittenden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Armitage v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Moulden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Duff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.