Legal Opinion
(PC)Wright v. Rodriguez
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 26, 2024No. 1:23-cv-01586Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEITH JEROME WRIGHT, Case No. 1:23-cv-01586 JLT GSA (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, REVOKING 13 v. PLAINTIFF’S IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS, AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO 14 RODRIGUEZ, et al., PAY THE FILING FEE IN FULL WITHIN 30 DAYS 15 Defendants. (Doc. 13) 16 17 Previously, the Court granted Keith Jerome Wright’s request to proceed in forma pauperis 18 in this action. However, upon review of Plaintiff’s litigation history, the assigned magistrate 19 judge found Plaintiff is subject…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Lomax v. Ortiz-MarquezSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Lockyer v. Mirant Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Valerio v. Boise Cascade Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1978
- Michael Valerio and Yung Hao Chang v. Boise Cascade CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.