Legal Opinion

United States v. Bear Marine Services

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided December 18, 1980No. Civ. A. 79-3331PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCENEAUX, District Judge.

Exerting a purely maritime claim, the United States seeks to recover oil clean-up costs from International Matex Tank Terminal (“IMTT”). The costs were incurred when a barge, in the tow of the Tug Frances Twitty and owned by Bear Marine Services, was holed when it struck a dolphin owned by IMTT. IMTT moved to dismiss the claim, asserting the exclusivity of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended by the Water and Environmental Quality Improvement Act of 1970, P.L. 224 of the 91st Congress, 84 Stat. 91, amended and recodified at 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251-1376…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Garland Wayne Kelly and Allen Eugene Kelly, Sr. v. J. C. Smith and Chicot Land Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BY AND THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME v. SS BournemouthDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1969
  3. State of Maryland, Dept. of N. Res. v. Amerada Hess Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1972
  4. United States v. Dixie Carriers, Inc., and Water Quality Insurance Syndicate, in Personam and M/v Dixie Buccaneer and T/b Abc 2311, in RemCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. Lebeouf Brothers Towing Co., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
  2. United States v. Northeastern Pharmaceutical & Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1984
  3. United States v. South Carolina Recycling and Disposal, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1986
  4. O'NEIL v. PicilloDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1988
  5. State of Colo. v. Asarco, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API