Legal Opinion

Dang v. Walgreens Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 2, 2023No. 1:22-cv-00177Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION TAM DANG YASMINE ACOSTA- AGUAYO, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Case No. 22-cv-00177 Plaintiffs, Judge Mary M. Rowland v. WALGREEN CO. d/b/a WALGREENS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs bring this putative class action against Defendant Walgreens alleging that three of its pain-relieving products mislead consumers because the products’ front labels state that they are “Maximum Strength” lidocaine products. Plaintiffs filed a ten-count First Amended Class…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Brewster McCauley v. City of ChicagCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. Patrick Camasta v. Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  5. Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API