Dang v. Walgreens Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION TAM DANG YASMINE ACOSTA- AGUAYO, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Case No. 22-cv-00177 Plaintiffs, Judge Mary M. Rowland v. WALGREEN CO. d/b/a WALGREENS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs bring this putative class action against Defendant Walgreens alleging that three of its pain-relieving products mislead consumers because the products’ front labels state that they are “Maximum Strength” lidocaine products. Plaintiffs filed a ten-count First Amended Class…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Brewster McCauley v. City of ChicagCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Patrick Camasta v. Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.