Legal Opinion
Raynor v. Landmark Chrysler
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 15, 2011PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ciparick, J.
In this dispute between an employee (claimant) and his employer and its workers’ compensation insurance carrier (the carrier), we are asked to interpret Workers’ Compensation Law § 27 (2) and § 15 (3) (w), amended by the Laws of 2007, as they *53relate to an award for a non-schedule permanent partial disability made after the effective date for an injury sustained years earlier. We conclude that the Workers’ Compensation Board (the Board) and the Appellate Division properly construed the amended statute by requiring the carrier to deposit a lump-sum amount into…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Connolly v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Joblon v. SolowNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. RyanNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Montane v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Matter of Edna Shannon v. Westchester County Department of Social ServicesNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
- Matter of Mancini v. Office of Children & Family Servs.New York Court of Appeals · 2018
- People v. M.E.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Matter of Sanchez v. Jacobi Med. Ctr.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.