Burba v. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Order reversed on the law with costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Defendant, Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation (RG&E), notified construction contractors in the area that it would not permit employment of plaintiffs on property owned by RG&E. Plaintiffs, members of labor unions, brought this action against RG&E alleging that RG&E intentionally interfered with their rights to employment under the union contracts. RG&E moved for summary judgment and Special Term denied the motion. On appeal, RG&E contends that plaintiffs have no cause of action for intentional interference with…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Burba v. Rochester Gas & Electric CorpAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
3Cited by18 opinions
- Purgess v. SharrockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Purgess v. SharrockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- George Lombard and Lomar, Inc. v. Booz-Allen & Hamilton, Inc. ("Bah"), and W. Frank Jones, Individually and as an Employee of BahCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Henneberry v. Sumitomo Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Catskill Development, L.L.C. v. Park Place Entertainment Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.