Legal Opinion

Edna Valley Watch v. County of San Luis Obispo

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 2, 2011No. B223653PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, P. J.

Here we hold a party may receive attorney’s fees incurred in an administrative hearing. The trial court denied a portion of appellants’ attorney’s fees requested under Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, the private attorney general statute.1 The court also denied one party’s attorney’s fees incurred in a petition for writ of mandate because of the party’s personal stake in the litigation. We reverse.

Section 1021.5 allows attorney’s fees in administrative proceedings. In addition, a party may not be disqualified from receiving attorney’s fees because of his personal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. North Bay Regional Center v. MaldonadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Connerly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Los Angeles Police Protective League v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. In Re HeadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Best v. California Apprenticeship CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Heron Bay Homeowners Ass'n v. City of San Leandro, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. K.M. ex rel. Bright v. Tustin Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
  3. Coalition for a Sustainable Future in Yucaipa v. City of YucaipaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Heron Bay Homeowners Assn. v. City of San LeandroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
  5. K.I. v. WagnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API