Legal Opinion
Rydberg v. Rydberg
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 13, 2004No. 20030212PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] The Ward County Social Service Board is appealing a Northwest Judicial District Court order dismissing a child support action against Andrew Rydberg because DNA testing excluded him as the father of Diane Rydberg’s child. The Board argues that because Andrew Rydberg did not rebut the presumption of paternity, the district court erred when it dismissed the child support action. The Board also argues the district court erred because it did not consider the best interests of the child involved and no guardian ad litem was appointed. We affirm, concluding the district…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Owens v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Nicholas H.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Public Service Commission v. Wimbledon Grain Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- N.C.C. v. C.S.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Larson v. Quanrud, Brink & ReiboldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rojas v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Interest of MaedcheNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- In the Interests of S.L.W. ex rel. A.W. v. A.K.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Cudworth v. Midcontinent CommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Cudworth v. Midcontinent CommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.