Legal Opinion

Schuler v. Dearing Chevrolet Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 26, 1948No. 31820PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Counsel for both parties rely on Cothran v. Witham, 123 Ga. 190 (supra). The plaintiff relies on this case to support its position that the instrument sued upon is a valid and binding contract. The defendant relies upon this case to support his position that the damages sought are too remote, speculative, and uncertain to form the basis of a recovery. The facts in Cothran v. Witham, supra, are substantially as follows: W. S. Witham, President of the Bank of Cartersville, sold J. C. Cothran 5 shares of capital stock in said bank. At the same time Cothran…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sizer & Co. v. Melton & SonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Cothran v. WithamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beverly v. Observer Publishing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  2. Stanford Motor Co. v. WestmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Poe v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1998
  4. Summers v. Adams Motor Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Solon Automated Services, Inc. v. Pines Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API