Legal Opinion

(PC) Armenta v. Shah

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 19, 2022No. 2:22-cv-00415Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD ARMENTA, Case No. 2:22-cv-00415-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: 13 v. (1) FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT; OR 14 SHAH, et al., (2) STAND BY HIS COMPLAINT 15 Defendants. SUBJECT TO A RECOMMENDATION THAT IT BE 16 DISMISSED 17 ECF No. 22 18 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 19 20 Plaintiff Richard Armenta, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights 21 action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleges that defendants violated his Eighth Amendment right to 22 adequate medical care. ECF…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  5. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API