Klampe v. Klampe
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Hpon application of Prank Klampe the district court for. Dodge county granted its order directing H. J. Edison to show cause why he should not pay over to said Frank Klampe $1,250. E'dison served upon plaintiff and her attorneys notice that he claimed an attorney’s lien upon the moneys due to defendant. The matter was heard by Childress, J., who discharged the order to show cause. From the order discharging the order to show cause, Frank, Klampe appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.
Plaintiff and defendant, for about 40 years, were husband and wife and resided most of that time on a farm of 80 acres in Mower county which plaintiff had inherited. Through their joint efforts they acquired an eighty in Dodge county and a house and lot in Kasson, titles to which were in the plaintiff. Domestic trouble arose and for a number of years they lived apart, plaintiff remaining upon the Mower county farm with the children and defendant residing elsewhere. For a time defendant was engaged in the implement business at Kasson, but did not succeed well. He was illiterate, unable to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Newman v. FreitasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Jordan v. WestermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Loveren v. LoverenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
- Hamilton v. HamiltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Baskerville v. BaskervilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- McCarthy v. SantangeloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- In Re the Proceedings for the Discipline of SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Opperud v. BusseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Sarja v. Pittsburgh Steel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.