Legal Opinion
In Re: Urbanski
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 8, 2016No. 2015-1272PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Gregory E. Urbanski and Kevin W. Lang (collectively, “Urbanski”) appeal from the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the “Board”) affirming the Examiner’s rejection of claims 43-50 and 52-68 of U.S. Patent Application 11/170,614 (the “'614 application”) as unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) (2006). 1 See Ex Parte Urbanski No.2013-002044, slip op. at 3, 11 (P.T.A.B. Oct. 9, 2014) (“Board Decision”)-, Joint App. (“J.A.”) 2-15. Because the Board did not err in concluding that the claims of the '614 application…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- In Re Baxter International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Michael L. McGinley v. Franklin Sports, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re: Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Axonics, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
- Axonics, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
- Cook Group Incorporated v. Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.