Legal Opinion

Adam J. Bertamini v. Railroad Retirement Board

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 23, 1971No. 24247PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The Railroad Retirement Board determined that petitioner is not entitled to a disability annuity under Section 2(a) 5 of the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 228b(a) 5 (1964)), and the question presented by this petition for review is whether substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that petitioner’s physical condition is not such that he is “unable to engage in any regular employment.” Petitioner has 19 years of service under the Act and is less than 60 years old. Under the circumstances, it is common ground between the parties that Section 2(a) 5 of the Act controls…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. Warren G. EarnestCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  2. Helen I. Gloss v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  3. Russell H. Duncan v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  4. Louis A. Schafer v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
  5. Carl B. Ogle v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mary Kirkland v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  2. Alfred L. Jacques v. United States Railroad Retirement Board, and the United States GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  3. Hofacker v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  4. Zane F. Chandler v. United States of America Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  5. William B. Andrews v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API