Legal Opinion

Westfall v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 8, 2014No. 07C23164; A140772PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

This case is before us on remand after the Oregon Supreme Court reversed our decision in Westfall v. Dept. of Corrections, 247 Or App 384, 271 P3d 116 (2011), rev’d and rent’d, 355 Or 144, 324 P3d 440 (2014). In our original opinion, we concluded that the trial court had erred in granting summary judgment to the Department of Corrections on the basis of discretionary immunity, which obviated the need for us to address plaintiff’s remaining arguments on appeal. On review, the Supreme Court reversed our discretionary-immunity decision and remanded the case to us, explaining:

“That does not mean…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. AmayaOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Donahue v. BowersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. Westfall v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Sullivan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  5. Blankenship v. SmalleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Emanuel Displaced Persons Association 2 v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023
  2. Eugene Sikora v. State of Iowa and Dr. Beth Skinner, in her official capacity as Director of the Iowa Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API