Devine Bros. v. City of Philadelphia
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDMAN, /.,
This class action is before the court on defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings.1 Because this court concludes that plaintiff’s claim is barred by the statute of limitations, the motion is granted, and judgment is entered in favor of defendant. In addition, the purported, class being left with no representative to pursue its interests, the action is dismissed in its entirety.
FACTS
Plaintiff, a general and mechanical contractor that had submitted bids to the city for public works *580contracts between November 1977 and June 1978, filed this class action suit in equity and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Janicik v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Boyle v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Alessandro v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Gallo v. J.C. Penney Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- R. S. Noonan, Inc. v. York School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.