State v. King

PEAY, Judge.

OPINION

The defendant was convicted by a jury of aggravated robbery. The trial judge sentenced the defendant as a Range II offender and imposed a twenty-year sentence.

In this appeal as of the right, the defendant raises five (5) issues for review.1 He contends that:

1. The evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to support the verdict of aggravated robbery;

2. His due process rights were violated when the State’s prosecuting witness committed penury regarding his prior criminal record and when the State misrepresented the witness’ prior criminal record to the jury;

3. The trial…