Blackwell, Enid & Southwestern Railway Co. v. Gist
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Court of Garfield County; before• James K. Beauchamp, Trial Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
Burford, C. J.:
The defendant in error brought her action in the district court of Garfield county against the plaintiff in error to recover damages for depreciation in value of her property by reason of the vacation and appropriation of the street in front of her lots for railway purposes. The plaintiff below, M. L. Gist, was the owner of lots 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 in block 3, in that part of the city of Enid platted originally as Jonesville. The lots fronted north on North Park avenue, a street eighty feet wide, and were bounded on the south and west by a 25 foot alley,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Barney v. KeokukSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Rigney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- Bohm v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- City of Chicago v. Union Building Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- In re Melon StreetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McKay v. City of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Mitchener v. City Com'rs, City of OkmulgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. City of ShawneeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
- Bullen v Arkansas Valley & W. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Arkansas Valley & W. Ry. Co. v. BullenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.