Commonwealth v. Nester
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, Judge:
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania appeals the order entered by the trial court which granted defendant’s motion to suppress certain pre-trial statements. We affirm.
On February 7, 1994, a caseworker from Berks County Children and Youth Services (CYS) received a report of suspected child abuse concerning K.K. The caseworker, Michelle Kauffman, called K.K.’s mother requesting that she, defendant (her paramour), and K.K. come to the CYS office for a meeting. Once there, Ms. Kauffman separately interviewed K.K., her mother, and defendant. During his interview, defendant confessed to…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. NesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Choi Chun Lam v. Donald Kelchner, Superintendent the District Attorney of the County of Lancaster the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Commonwealth v. GommerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. Choi Chun LamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. RosaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.