Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Nester

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 8, 1995PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania appeals the order entered by the trial court which granted defendant’s motion to suppress certain pre-trial statements. We affirm.

On February 7, 1994, a caseworker from Berks County Children and Youth Services (CYS) received a report of suspected child abuse concerning K.K. The caseworker, Michelle Kauffman, called K.K.’s mother requesting that she, defendant (her paramour), and K.K. come to the CYS office for a meeting. Once there, Ms. Kauffman separately interviewed K.K., her mother, and defendant. During his interview, defendant confessed to…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. NesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Choi Chun Lam v. Donald Kelchner, Superintendent the District Attorney of the County of Lancaster the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  3. Commonwealth v. GommerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. Choi Chun LamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. RosaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API