Legal Opinion
Carney v. Heisch
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 24, 1924No. Civ. No. 2801PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
This is an action for unlawful detainer. The plaintiff leased certain lands to defendant “for a period of one year commencing on November 1st, 1922, and ending on October 31st, 1923.” The lease contained the following provisions:
“It is understood that the said property is for sale, and this lease is executed with that knowledge. The party of the second part hereby agrees that in the event that a sale of the said property be made during the term of this lease, that he will quit and surrender the possession of said property at the end of any annual period of said lease, after written notice by…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mershon v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
3Cited by4 opinions
- Landberg v. LandbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. Construction Products Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Pope v. GoetheSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- Hayward Lumber & Inv. Co. v. Construction Prod. Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953