People v. Barkman
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtY. J. Brennan, J.
The question here is whether the 1967 amendment 1 of section 724(c) of the motor vehicle code eliminates scienter as an element of the misdemeanor defined by sections 716(a) and 722 of the code. 2 We conclude that it does not.
On March 19, 1968, a weighmaster in Monroe County weighed a true]? owned by defendant Bark-man, found that its weight exceeded the limitations prescribed in section 722 of the motor vehicle code, and issued a notice of violation. At the trial in the circuit court, the prosecutor established that the defendant owned the truck and that it had indeed been driven on a public…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Colonial Stores Incorporated v. ScholzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
- City of Eastlake v. RuggieroOhio Court of Appeals · 1966
- People v. Brown Bros. Equipment Co., Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966
- People v. BROWN BROS. EQUIPMENT CO.Michigan Supreme Court · 1967
- Sawyer v. MouldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Accorso v. Appeals Board of the Administrative Adjudication BureauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. Central Transport, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977