Legal Opinion
Aygen v. District of Columbia Public Schools
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 8, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2010-0847PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, District Judge
Before the Court are plaintiffs motion for reconsideration and plaintiffs motion for sanctions. For the following reasons and after consideration of the parties’ briefing and relevant legal standards, plaintiffs motions for reconsideration and sanctions will be DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND
In 2010, the plaintiff, Ms. Nursat Aygen, brought an action pro se against District of Columbia Public Schools (“District”) for violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2601. 1 This Court granted the District’s motion for dismissal…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Joseph P. Murray v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Marino v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Summers, Frank v. Howard UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Lightfoot v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Kittner v. GatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Dynamic Visions, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. United States Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Landfall Trust LLC v. Fidelity National Title Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2023
- Letendre v. Parallon Enterprises, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2025
- Zuza v. Office of the High RepresentaitveDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016