Legal Opinion
Joseph P. Murray v. District of Columbia
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 21, 1995No. 94-7062, 94-7063PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.
ROGERS, Circuit Judge:
In these consolidated appeals, Joseph P. Murray and others challenge orders of the district court denying their motions for reconsideration under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Because appellants failed to file an opposition or otherwise present a potentially meritorious claim or defense to the District of Columbia’s motion to dismiss their amended complaint in No. 94-7062, and they offer no explanation for not doing so, we find no abuse of discretion by the district court and affirm the denial of the Rule 60(b)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers Union, Local No. 59 v. Superline Transportation Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Toney Gomes, Jr. v. Ellen L. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Robert Lepkowski v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Cole Madsen v. A. J. Bumb, Receiver and Trustee for the Estate of Chase Capital Corporation, Dba Quail Valley Country Club, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Smalls, Eugene C. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- In Re Islamic Republic of Iran Terrorism LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Norman, John D. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Marino v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Lemmons v. Georgetown University HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.