Kennecott Copper Corp. v. State Tax Commission
Utah Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceCrockett, Justice
(special and supplemental concurrence).
Although the Tax Commission purported to follow the formula method (Massachusetts Formula) authorized under 80-13-21 (6) U.C.A.1943,1 review of this case clearly indicates that it regards the result obtained *321from a literal application of that formula as producing an unrealistic and inequitable result insofar as the taxpayer is concerned. Illustrative of this are the figures for 1942 as set forth in the Commission’s brief as a typical year. (All sums are given in round figures.) In that year the Utah Mine produced 86 million dollars gross income which…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Starkweather v. ConnerArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Coeur D'Alenes Lead Co. v. KingsburyIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
- Stricker v. BillingsleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Holmes v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Saddler v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934