Legal Opinion

Klaas v. Boston Insurance Co.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 4, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a suit to determine the force and effect of certain riders attached to four policies of insurance issued by the defendant companies. The rider in each case reads as follows:

"The interest in this policy is now vested in John A. Krantz, as owner and not as heretofore. Loss, if any, firstly payable to the Prudential Insurance Company of America as first mortgagee, and secondly payable to Max Klaas as second mortgagee. Non-contribution clause attached."

It is admitted that when the loss by fire occurred, these riders were not actually physically attached to the policies. The policies were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gross v. YeskelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1926
  2. Rena Peddie Crosley v. Superb Realty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1921
  3. Koch v. Commonwealth InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. By-Fi B. L. Asso. v. N.Y. Casualty Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  2. Binns v. CsikNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
  3. Laytham v. MannNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  4. Klass v. Boston Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1929
  5. Parrette v. Citizens Casualty Co. of N.Y.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API