Legal Opinion

Binns v. Csik

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided September 6, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

This is a suit brought for the reformation of certain mortgages, deeds and other documents relating to adjoining parcels of real estate, and is before the court on a motion to strike the bill.

In 1927, one Cmoch and his wife purchased certain lots in East Rutherford known as lots No. 16, 17 and 18. Soon thereafter Cmoch and his wife executed a mortgage on part of said tract to one Herman C. Rust and shortly thereafter executed another mortgage to Rust on the balance of the premises. Complainant purchased one of these mortgages and the defendants the other. In 1933, each of these mortgages was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Green v. StoneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
  2. Giammares v. Allemannia Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
  3. Klaas v. Boston Insurance Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Binns v. CsikNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API