Rockmore v. American Hatters & Furriers, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtHand, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). We see no reason to differ with the learned District Judge in his finding that the transaction between Bleetstein and Gross was not a sale. Indeed, there is no substantial evidence to the contrary. Gross’s testimony, whieh alone could be counted on to establish one, is to the last degree unsatisfactory, yet, so far as it permits of intelligible understanding, it seems to us to bear out Bleetstein’s story that he did not mean to accept Gross as a buyer, but to give him the skins to sell on commission. It is true that his language is not wholly consistent,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ludvigh v. American Woolen Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re SachsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1929
- In re SachsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1927
- Robie v. Myers Equipment Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1953
- Wilson v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020