Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland v. Shields

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 3, 1995No. 67168PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Spellacy, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, the city of Cleveland (“Cleveland”), appeals the granting of defendant-appellee Annett Shields’s motion to dismiss. Shields had been charged with resisting arrest.

Cleveland assigns the following error upon appeal:

“The trial court erred by granting appellee’s motion to dismiss based on a warrantless entry into a home to make a felony arrest when exigent circumstances justified the entry.”

Finding the assignment of error to have merit, the judgment of the trial court is reversed.

I

On February 5, 1994, Mark Mazur, a Cleveland Police Officer assigned…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. State v. CheersOhio Court of Appeals · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. LloydOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. State v. Scott M.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. State v. BookerOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Thorne v. Steubenville Police OfficerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
  5. State v. CrossOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API