City of Cleveland v. Shields
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Spellacy, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant, the city of Cleveland (“Cleveland”), appeals the granting of defendant-appellee Annett Shields’s motion to dismiss. Shields had been charged with resisting arrest.
Cleveland assigns the following error upon appeal:
“The trial court erred by granting appellee’s motion to dismiss based on a warrantless entry into a home to make a felony arrest when exigent circumstances justified the entry.”
Finding the assignment of error to have merit, the judgment of the trial court is reversed.
I
On February 5, 1994, Mark Mazur, a Cleveland Police Officer assigned…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. CheersOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. LloydOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. Scott M.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. BookerOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Thorne v. Steubenville Police OfficerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
- State v. CrossOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.