Legal Opinion
Metro. Water Dist. of S. Cal. v. Winograd
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided May 23, 2018No. B276898PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChavez, J.
*883American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees, Local 1902, AFL/CIO (AFSCME), real party in interest and appellant, appeals from a trial court decision granting a writ of administrative mandamus filed by respondent Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (the District). The District filed the petition *625under Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5 to challenge the decision of a hearing officer on an AFSCME grievance. The trial court set aside the hearing officer's decision on the grounds that the hearing officer's decision (1) granted relief on an issue that was not…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Fairfield v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Wilson & Wilson v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- City of Santa Monica v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- American Indian Model Schools v. Oakland Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. Metropolitan Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Zolly v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Zolly v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020