United States v. Ira S. Bushey & Sons, Inc.
District Court, D. Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
OAKES, Circuit Judge.
The Government’s complaint alleges that the corporate defendants have violated the Refuse Act, 33 U.S.C. § 407, in seven instances since 1967. These violations are said to have occurred in the course of defendants’ business of transporting petroleum products across Lake Champlain to Vermont waters and shores. 1 The action is civil in nature, the relief requested a permanent injunction requiring defendants to observe specified safety regulations. 2 The aim of the Government as plaintiff is to force defendants to conduct their operations in such a way that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Illinois v. City of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Tug Ocean Prince, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- City of Evansville, Indiana v. Kentucky Liquid Recycling, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Stream Pollution Control Board of the State of Indiana, and Zarko Sekerez, Proposed Intervenor v. United States Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Rohm & Haas Company and Rohm & Haas of Texas, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Parsell v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.