Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Buss
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Judge Blatt :
I must respectfully dissent.
The claimant here was- given a choice by his employer either to use his accrued annual and sick leave or to be placed at once on indefinite leave without pay. He chose the latter. In either case, however, it was clear that he would not receive his regular salary nor would he perform any services during the claim weeks in question.
On these facts the majority has concluded that claimant was not “unemployed” during these claim weeks and is not, therefore, entitled to unemployment compensation. And, relying upon Gianfelice Unem*165ployment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Warner Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Susquehanna Collieries Division v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Sopko Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Lucciola v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- United States Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.