Legal Opinion

Balata Development Corp. v. Reed

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 8, 2001No. A01A0222PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mikell, Judge.

Balata Development Corporation (“Balata”) appeals the trial court’s ruling that Balata is not entitled to a refund of the earnest money it paid pursuant to a contract it executed with Jerry Reed to purchase Reed’s property. We reverse.

It is undisputed that the contract was prepared and printed by Balata. Section 2 of the contract, entitled “Earnest Money Deposit,” provides: “Buyer shall, simultaneously with its execution hereof, deposit with Seller the sum of Fifty Thousand ($50,000) AND NO/ 100 dollars as the Earnest Money Deposit hereunder. Such sum shall non refundable [sic]…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Deep Six, Inc. v. AbernathyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  2. Asian Square Partners, L.P. v. Cuong Quynh LyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. Estate of Sam Farkas, Inc. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. Thornton v. KumarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  5. Georgia Ass'n of Educators, Inc. v. Paragon Productions, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Eckerd Corp. v. Alterman Properties, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  2. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Hall CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. KirklandDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2007
  4. Ali v. AarabiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. Dinerman v. SantiagoVermont Superior Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API