Legal Opinion
Thornton v. Kumar
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 18, 1999No. A99A1248PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Judge.
Bob and Patricia Thornton sued Surender Kumar and Barry Gibbs to recover earnest money paid to Kumar and Gibbs as sellers in a real estate contract with the Thorntons. Kumar and Gibbs refused to return the earnest money, maintaining that the Thorntons failed to provide notice of termination as required by the contract. When all parties (except Gibbs) moved for summary judgment, the trial court granted Kumar’s motion and denied the Thorntons’, which ruling the Thorntons appeal. Because the Thorntons terminated the agreement without proper notice and breached the contract, we…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Richard Haney Ford, Inc. v. Ford Dealer Computer ServicesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Century 21 Pinetree Properties, Inc. v. CasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Asian Square Partners, L.P. v. Cuong Quynh LyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Atlanta Six Flags Partnership v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Deep Six, Inc. v. AbernathyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Markowitz v. WielandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Atlanta Development, Inc. v. Emerald Capital Investment, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Tachdjian v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- RLI Insurance v. Highlands on Ponce, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.