Legal Opinion

(PC) Casteneda v. Quiring

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 30, 2022No. 2:21-cv-02196Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LORENZO CASTENEDA, No. 2:21-cv-2196 DAD KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 J. QUIRING, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and is proceeding in forma pauperis. This proceeding was referred to this court 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff’s motion to amend and proposed 20 amended complaint are before the court. 21 As discussed below, plaintiff’s motion to amend is…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API