(PC) Casteneda v. Quiring
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LORENZO CASTENEDA, No. 2:21-cv-2196 DAD KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 J. QUIRING, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and is proceeding in forma pauperis. This proceeding was referred to this court 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff’s motion to amend and proposed 20 amended complaint are before the court. 21 As discussed below, plaintiff’s motion to amend is…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.