Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Bothfuhr v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railway Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1922No. 14928PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Farmer

Kankakee county levied a tax for county purposes of fifty cents on the $100 valuation, and made an additional levy of twenty-five cents on the $100 valuation for “county highway tax.” Appellant filed objections to the levy on the ground the county had no authority to levy a tax in excess of fifty cents on the $100, also that the levy for county highway tax was for the sum of $68,000, “for the purpose of improving, maintaining and repairing the State aid roads required to be improved, maintained and repaired by the county, and for the payment of lands, quarries, pits or other deposits of road…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Reynolds v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  2. People ex rel. Schaumleffel v. HoerrIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  3. People ex rel. Murray v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. The People v. DeatherageIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  2. People ex rel. Browne v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1923
  3. People ex rel. Frazier v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Heideman v. KelseyIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  5. People ex rel. Murray v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API