Legal Opinion

Rizzo v. Ahern

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 28, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

The plaintiff was injured and his bicycle was damaged in a collision with an automobile driven by the defendant. Upon conflicting evidence it could be found *6that the plaintiff, while travelling easterly on Pond Street, in Waltham, and approaching a driveway entering the street on his right, saw the automobile coming toward the street along the driveway about fifty feet from the street and moving at about fourteen miles per hour. He was himself moving at about nine miles per hour straight along the carriage way of the street about two feet from the sidewalk edge, and was about twenty feet from…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Anger v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Copithorn v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Griffin v. FeeneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Byrne v. DunnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. Reese v. McGinn Bus Company, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
  5. Collier v. Cahill Motor Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API