Albert Matut, as the Possessor of Certain Cash v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, we examine the propriety of a termination assessment and subsequent notice of deficiency issued pursuant to the jeopardy presumptions of § 6867 of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) to Albert Matut in his capacity as possessor of $175,000 cash. We conclude that the assessment and notice were proper and thus we vacate the decision below and remand this case to the Tax Court with instructions to enter a deficiency judgment against Albert Matut as possessor of certain cash.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Mario Lignarolo allegedly was employed by COINPA,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matut v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
- Matut v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
- Matut v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
- Schaefer v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1987
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bruce Morgan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- State v. CunninghamOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- Bruce Morgan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- I.L. Constr., Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
- Keith v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.