Legal Opinion

Keith v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided August 17, 1989No. Docket No. 35296-85Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

CHARLES R. KEITH, AS POSSESSOR OF CERTAIN CASH, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Keith v. Commissioner

Docket No. 35296-85

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1989-437; 1989 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 436; 57 T.C.M. (CCH) 1351; T.C.M. (RIA) 89437;

August 17, 1989

Evelyn E. Small, for the petitioner.

John C. McDougal, for the respondent.

HAMBLEN

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

HAMBLEN, Judge: Respondent determined that petitioner, as possessor of certain cash, owed a deficiency in Federal income tax of $ 16,000 for 1984. The issues for decision are: 1) whether we have…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. Leon E. Hendrickson, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner, and Peoples Loan & Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Matut v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
  3. Matut v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
  4. Albert Matut, as the Possessor of Certain Cash v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  5. Peoples Loan & Trust Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API