State v. Kona (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
{¶ 1} In this case, we hold that when in accordance with the requirements of a pretrial diversion program, a noncitizen defendant admits sufficient facts to warrant a finding of guilt, the trial court must provide to the defendant the advisement contained in R.C. 2943.031(A) that the admission of guilt may affect his or her immigration status, i.e., that it “may have the consequences of deportation, exclusion from admission to the United States, or denial of naturalization pursuant to the laws of the United States.”
Factual and Procedural Background
{¶ 2} Defendant-appellant, Issa Kona, is not…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- State v. FrancisOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Juan Manuel Murillo-Espinoza v. Immigration and Naturalization Service John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- OZKOKBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
- PICKERINGBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. AdamesOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. HernandezOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. PalafoxOhio Court of Appeals · 2021