Legal Opinion

DeCicco v. D&R General Contracting, Inc.

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided December 9, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreco, J.

This is a Dist./Mun. Cts. RADA, Rule 8A appeal by the plaintiffs of the trial courts Mass. R Civ. P., Rule 41(b) (2) judgment of dismissal.

The plaintiffs’ claim arose out of a one-car motor vehicle accident in Woburn, Massachusetts in an area of Route 93 which was then in the process of being repaved. In order to avoid contact with a construction barrel, plaintiff Suzanne DeCicco swerved to the right, then to the left and struck the guard-rail in the median. She sued defendant D&R General Contracting, the general contractor for the paving project who had placed the barrel on the highway.

At…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Delano Growers' Cooperative Winery v. Supreme Wine Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Ryan, Elliott & Co. v. Leggat, McCall & Werner, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  4. Devito v. Cellular Mobile Communications, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1993
  5. Ann & Hope, Inc. v. MuratoreMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Prophete v. PolyniceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
  2. Burgess v. UzarinsMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API