Assets Collecting Co. v. Barnes-King Development Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York; E. Henry Lacombe, Judge. Action by the Assets Collecting Company against the Barnes-King Development Company. From an ord^r vacating an attachment, unless plaintiff increased the security to $2,500, it brings error.
1Per curiam
This is a motion to quash a writ of error to review an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated July 22, 1913, which order provided that the attachment heretofore granted be vacated unless the plaintiff increase the existing security from $1,000 to $2,500. The plaintiff has failed to increase the security as required and now sues out a writ of error to *207review the order requiring it. The court below, being of the opinion that the existing security was insufficient, was certainly justified in increasing it. Its action was in no sense final, but was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bostwick v. BrinkerhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Leitensdorfer v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Atlantic Lumber Co. v. Bucki & Son Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1899
3Cited by1 opinion
- Crooker v. KnudsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916